At last week's Student Senate meeting, the Senate reformed the relatively new Freedom of Information Policy, organized hurricane relief efforts, and took attempts to reform the undergraduate printing quota to a new level. This was the third meeting of the Student Senate this year, yet it was relatively busy with new business and chair reports.
The alteration of the Freedom of Information Policy, which provides procedure for information requests and increases organizational transparency, made it harder for the Senate to hold closed executive session meetings on sensitive issues, requiring a two-thirds vote to exclude any press or general students.
Petitions for an appeal for information withheld from Senate can now be submitted with a single signature, not the 25-student petition required in the past. Rejection of those petitions also became a more arduous task for Senate, requiring a three-fourths vote to silence such petitions from discussion.
"If more than 10 senators want to hear a petition, it's worthwhile," said Internal Development chair Joe Arasin, an SCS junior, after there were some initial challenges to the proportion of senators required to shut out an appeal.
Some smaller modifications of the policy included a provision to upload a compressed file of every semester's worth of Student Senate meeting minutes, and the removal of several superfluous financing sentences.
Student Body President Tom Sabram and Student Body Vice-President Nicolette Louissaint spoke briefly on hurricane aid organization, after an informal information session was held earlier in the afternoon. A committee titled Operation Katrina Aid and Relief Effort (K.A.R.E.) will spearhead the effort and monitor all student organizations involved in hurricane relief events. The committee was expected to be formed last weekend. Additional information on the relief efforts at Carnegie Mellon can be found at http://www.studentaffairs.cmu.edu/katrina/.
The Business Affairs chairman, CFA senior Trevor Clark, took various complaints about the new printer quota to the printer policy makers. "I don't think [the changes] will be approved, but hopefully we can get these issues across," said Clark.
Editor's Note: There was an error in the originally published article. The sentence, "The alteration of the Freedom of Information Policy... made it harder for the Senate to hold closed executive session meetings on sensitive issues, requiring a two-thirds vote to exclude any press or general students" read "The alteration of the Freedom of Information Policy... made it easier for the Senate to hold closed executive session meetings on sensitive issues, requiring only a two-thirds vote to exclude any press or general students."
On 9/13/05 at 7:07 pm, Nicholas Scocozzo posted:
Just a quick note. Executive sessions of Senate (meetings of its committee chairs and the Senate chair) were previously considered closed, with no exceptions. Now, the rule has been changed so those meetings are by default open. A two-thirds vote of the Executive Committee is required to now close the meeting.
On 9/15/05 at 4:04 pm, Nick Ennis posted:
The new printing policy is smart. Heavy users of the campus printing facilities should pay for their use. The cost of printing can either be shared equally by all (through tuition), or students can pay individually. Why should a student who prints 200 pages per semester pay the same as those that print 800? Charging users for additional pages will cut back on unnecessary printing, and only those with value will be printed. This will save paper and make students think twice about printing one PowerPoint slide per page instead of four or six. I suspect only excessive printers have actually complained about this.
Share your opinion with other Pulse readers. Login below or
register
to begin posting.